Volume : 7, Issue : 2, February - 2018
A comparative study of Ziehl Neelsen, Gabbet‘s and Fluorescent staining methods to detect acid fast bacilli in sputum samples.
Ms. Sharon Priya P. J, Dr. Thomas. S. Kuruvilla
Abstract :
<p> </p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:150%"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:150%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-bidi-font-weight: bold"><span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>Tuberculosis <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>remains <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>world’s <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>leading <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>cause <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>of <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>death <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>from <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>a <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>single <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>infectious agent. Pulmonary <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>tuberculosis (PTB) is <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>the <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>most <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>common <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>presentation <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>of <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>tuberculosis. </span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">Here we compare Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN),</span><i><span style="font-size:9.0pt; line-height:150%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""> </span></i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-bidi-font-style:italic">Gabbet’s <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>and <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>Fluorescent staining (FS) methods <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>to <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>determine <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>efficiency <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>and cost effectiveness of diagnosing<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>pulmonary tuberculosis<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>from sputum<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>samples.</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""> <span style="mso-bidi-font-style:italic">Three <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>smear<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>from 148 sputum <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>samples<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>of<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>PTB cases</span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family: "Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:Calii"> were prepared and stained by the above methods.</span><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-bidi-font-style:italic"> </span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:150%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-bidi-font-style: italic">Of <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>the <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>samples <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>examined, 71.6% and 53.4% and 85.8% cases were detected <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>by <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:150%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">Ziehl-Neelsen,</span><i><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""> <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span></span></i><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:150%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-bidi-font-style: italic">Gabbet’s<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>and<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>Fluorescence <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>staining <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>respectively</span><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">. </span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-bidi-font-style:italic">Fluorescent staining <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>was <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>found to be more reliable and cost effective method <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>particularly<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>when <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>dealing with <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>large sample loads than </span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">Ziehl-Neelsen<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>and<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span><span style="mso-bidi-font-style:italic">Gabbet’s <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>staining technique.<o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
Keywords :
Article:
Download PDF Journal DOI : 10.15373/2249555XCite This Article:
Ms. Sharon Priya P. J, Dr. Thomas. S. Kuruvilla, A comparative study of Ziehl Neelsen, Gabbet‘s and Fluorescent staining methods to detect acid fast bacilli in sputum samples., GLOBAL JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS : VOLUME-7, ISSUE-2, FEBRUARY-2018