Volume : 7, Issue : 2, February - 2018
Comparative study of two combinations of ropivacaine and fentanyl for postoperative pain relief after umblical and lower abdominal surgeries
Dr. Nidhi Asati, Dr Amit Jain, Dr Nitish Nayak, Dr K K Arora
Abstract :
<p> </p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:7.5pt;text-align:justify;text-justify: inter-ideograph;background:white"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"">Objectives</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-weight:bold">: Ropivacaine</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""> has been used, either alone or with local anesthetics, for <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>epidural analgesia. This study was undertaken to compare quality and safety of two combinations of epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>for providing postoperative analgesia for 48 hours after <span style="mso-font-kerning:18.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bold">umblical and lower abdominal surgeries</span> .<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:7.5pt;text-align:justify;text-justify: inter-ideograph;background:white"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"">Methodology: </span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"">In a prospective randomized, controlled study, 70 patients age group between 20-60 years, of either gender, scheduled for routine <span style="mso-font-kerning:18.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight: bold">umblical and lower abdominal surgeries</span> were randomly distributed into two groups of 35 patients each. Postoperatively,<b><span style="mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt"> </span></b><span style="mso-font-kerning:18.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight: bold">two combinations of ropivacaine and fentanyl[group 1 ropivacaine .2% and fentanyl 4</span> µg<span style="mso-font-kerning:18.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight: bold"> and group 2 ropivacaine .1% and fentanyl 2</span> µg<span style="mso-font-kerning:18.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bold"> ] <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>for postoperative pain relief</span>, diluted in 10 ml of normal saline was injected in the <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>epidural space (between L<sub>2 </sub>–L<sub>3 </sub>space) through the catheter and then repeated 6 hourly. Pain intensity score, onset of analgesia,number of top-ups required andoverall patient satisfaction score were recorded.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:7.5pt;text-align:justify;text-justify: inter-ideograph;background:white"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"">Results:</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""> Mean onset of analgesia was 10.31 ± 1.5 min with <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>group 1 as against 11.23 ± 1.2 min with<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>group 2 . Pain Intensity (PPI) score ≤ 1 was observed in 68.21% observations belonging to <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>group 1 and in 60 % observations belonging to <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>group 2. Twenty five patients (71.4%) from<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>group 1 and 30 patients (85.7%) from f group 2 required rescue analgesia. The patient’s feedback on pain relief was graded as very good or good by 78.5% of the patients in Group-1 and 69% patients in Group-2.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:7.5pt;text-align:justify;text-justify: inter-ideograph;background:white"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"">Conclusion: </span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"">Though both drug combinations <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>are equally safe,<b> group 1 concentration</b> is faster acting, more potent and efficient analgesic than group 2 when used for postoperative pain relief in <span style="mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bold">umblical and lower abdominal surgeries</span>.Howevermotor power was better preserved in group 2<o:p></o:p></span></p>
Keywords :
Article:
Download PDF Journal DOI : 10.15373/2249555XCite This Article:
Dr. Nidhi Asati, Dr Amit Jain, Dr Nitish Nayak, Dr K K Arora, Comparative study of two combinations of ropivacaine and fentanyl for postoperative pain relief after umblical and lower abdominal surgeries, GLOBAL JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS : VOLUME-7, ISSUE-2, FEBRUARY-2018


MENU
MENU